A musician friend said about negotiating a deal on a song,
“Well, part of something is better than all of nothing.” He was referring to
the fact that when you do get artist interest in a song, it’s not unusual for
everyone to want a piece of the pie. Either you are willing to give up part of your ownership or
no deal. You may have been dazzled by
reports of how much money you can make if you hit it big, but that’s as easy as
winning the lottery. Here are a couple scenarios from personal experience.
Expenses Add Up
On a recent pitch sheet, a publisher wanted songs for two
established artists. The listing specified that he would require 100% of the
publishing, non-negotiable. Was he going to reimburse the songwriter for the
cost of the demo, roughly $700? The answer, as expected: no.
But the demo price is only one of the expenses that add up
quickly for the songwriter. Not every song is a winner. For talking purposes,
let’s say you spend $700 each on five demos. You are $3500 out of pocket even
though only one shows promise in the market. You also paid around $200 up to
$400 plus for a year’s subscription to the pitch sheet.
If you belong to a songwriting organization, you owe annual
dues, as you do for membership in performance rights organizations like ASCAP
or BMI in the U.S. If you are eligible to be a voting member of the Recording
Academy, that annual due currently costs you another hundred bucks.
Those numbers do not include the dollars spent on home
recording equipment or music gear. Notice that the time you put into writing
the song and pitching it receives zero dollar credit. You labor for free. But
if you put a figure on your hours, you can see that for one song to reach the
stage of “recorded and released,” a songwriter will likely have invested
thousands of dollars.
It’s Tough to Recoup
So you get a cut and the money rolls in. Not really. You may wait six months or longer to receive
performance royalties, a good year if the artist is internationally based.
Mechanical/digital royalties for sale of that one song on an album are
currently 9.1 cents, split between the publisher/s and the songwriter/s.
Another example from personal experience: an American artist wanted to record a
song but only on the condition that the artist received credit for co-writing
and, along with another publisher, a share in the royalties. In still another
case, the same song was translated for an artist in Europe. The translator legitimately
deserved and received a share of the writing credit, ergo a share of the
royalties. After two years on this one song, not a penny of investment had been
recouped. Three years later, the performance royalties (no digital/mechanical dollars) came in under $100 in spite of the fact that the song was a number one pop dance of the year in that country. Getting a report of sales can also be problematic since labels are often indies and don’t have the accounting resources
of the majors.
I once hit it big in the 1990s with one song on one major artist’s
album. But that came after ten years of doing demos and pitching. You do the
numbers and you’ll understand why I say don’t expect to get rich. What about
artists versus songwriters? TIME magazine online published an article about a
two-man band titled “Want to Be a Rock Star? You’ll Need $100,000.” There you
go.
No comments:
Post a Comment